Quote:1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5 6.Ne5 c6 7.g4 Be6 8.g5
Personally, I would be extremely happy to hold the Black pieces here. I think it is simply crazy to talk about +- after 1. d4 d5 2. e4; White is only += after 2. c4!, for crying out loud.
Schoupal's claim in this regard reminds me of a story about a certain Swiss farmer who spent his life in a mountain village, devoting all his spare time to the analysis of chess. One day in his old age, he had it all figured out, so he walked down from his mountain, took the train to Zurich, and showed up at the chess club there, the strongest in Switzerland.
"The initial position is won for White," he calmly asserted, but he received only laughter in reply. "Show us this win, then, O Wise One!" chuckled a local master. So they all gathered around the farmer's board, expecting to be treated to a good joke.
But in variation after variation, with brilliant move after brilliant move, the old man proved White's winning advantage. While the session dragged on, two GMs showed up and looked at the lines being debated. Sometimes they offered ideas, but always the old man had perfect answers. The GMs looked anxiously at each other. "So," said one, "what shall we do about this?"
Some days later, the old man had failed to return to the mountain, and his relatives went into town to tell the authorities about it. The Zurich police were telephoned, and since the old fellow was known to be devoted to chess, they inquired at the club. But upon listening to the old man's description, the players there all denied having seen such a person. The old man was never seen again, and the game of chess went on as before.